Accession No
TEMP.00817
Description
1 Levallois flake.
Place
Europe; France; Somme; St Acheul
Period
Palaeolithic
Source
Prigg, H [collector]; Evans, John (Sir) [collector]; Fox Collection
Department
Arch
Reference Numbers
TEMP.00817; MAA: 1923.1047 [incorrect number]; 1923.1074 [incorrect number]; 648 [Fox Coll.]
Cultural Affliation
Material
Stone
Local Term
Measurements
Events
Description (Labels & Markings)
Marked in blue ink: '648 St Acheul' [Fox collection number].
Event Date
Author: Lucie Carreau
Description (Labels & Markings)
Marked in black ink: 'ST ACHEUL 1890'.
Event Date 1890
Author: Lucie Carreau
Context (Other owners)
Entry dated 8.12.14 in the Fox catalogue reads: 'From part of Evans collection (which also included some of Priggs (Bury St Edmunds collection) which was sold at Sotheby's [...] (Prigg) [...] 648. Flakes. St Acheul (1866 + 1890) = 2.'
Event Date 8/12/1914
Author: Lucie Carreau
Description (Physical description)
1 Levallois flake.
Event Date 04/02/2019
Author: Lucie Carreau
Context (Other)
1923.1074 was entered in the Accession Register as ‘L[ower] Palaeo[lithic] C[oup] de P[oing]s etc. 1 Moust[erian] point’ from France, as part of William Ransom’s collection given by his son Francis. Apart from the Mousterian point, there is no indication of the number of objects associated with 1923.1074, and Ransom is not known to have numbered his collections with a distinguishing label or mark. At an unknown point after 1923 at least one previously accessioned French handaxe (1883.12 A, see also 1888.14.2) was erroneously marked ‘1923.1074’. Other French handaxes marked ‘1923.1074’ certainly came into the museum from other donors – four from G.J.B. Fox (now TEMP.00815-TEMP.00818), one from Walter K. Foster (now TEMP.00819) – but their correct accession number is unknown, if they were ever assigned one. It is therefore clear that not all the objects marked and subsequently given catalogued cards as 1923.1074 were actually part of the Ransom collection, and it is currently impossible to identify which were in the 1923 donation. Although it is unknown why or when this mistake took place, it may relate to the fact that all the material in question is from Palaeolithic France (see also 1925.18).
Event Date 11/2/2019
Author: Lucie Carreau
FM:282765
Images (Click to view full size):